Precious Chikwendu files suit against ex-hubby Fani-Kayode seeking enforcement of her fundamental human rights

0
469

Precious Chikwendu, the ex-wife of former Aviation Minister Femi Fani-Kayode has filed a lawsuit against her estranged husband seeking the enforcement of her fundamental human rights.

The former beauty queen and mother of four children who filed the suit before a Federal High Court in Abuja is demanding the sum of N800m as damages against her former husband.

Other respondents listed in the suit filed by her lawyer, Abdul-Aziz Jimoh include the Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Force CID, Commissioner of Police, FCT, CSP James Idachaba (OC Legal CID), FCT Command, his officers and means defendants and she is demanding the sum of N800m as damages.

Precious Chikwendu is demanding the said amount because of the roles the respondents have played in “intimidating and harassing” her during the pendency of her custody suit.

READ ALSO: Precious Chikwendu shades estranged husband Fani-Kayode in cryptic post after he joined APC

She also asked the court to restrain the IGP, his officers and men from intimidating and harassing her in any form; pending the hearing and determination of her suit seeking the custody of the four children she had with Fani-Kayode.

In an affidavit in support of her court application, Precious Chikwendu stated that; “I was in a most tempestuous and violent relationship with the fifth respondent (Fani-Kayode), a qualified legal practitioner, a politician and a former minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The fifth respondent and I have four children together and I am forcefully separated from our children, who are all minors.

Consequent upon the unbridled violence perpetrated against me by the fifth respondent and the forceful separation from our children, I filed a suit in the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, with Suit No CV/372/2021.

“Rather than allow the contending matters placed before the FCT High Court to be determined by the honorable court, the fifth respondent has persisted in using the Police officers under the control of the first respondent (IGP) and supervised by the second respondent (Commissioner of Police FCT) incessantly to intimidate and harass me with a view to interfering in the adjudicatory powers of a competent court of justice.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here